HC adjourns actor Dhanush case to March 27

  • | Tuesday | 21st March, 2017

Prakash adjourned the case after hearing the case in-camera in his chambers for nearly two hours. The Madras High Court Bench here on Monday adjourned to March 27 further hearing on a petition filed by actor Dhanush to quash a maintenance case filed against him by a couple based at Melur near here. It was only after the Magistrate issued summons to Dhanush, the present petition was filed in the Bench. Subsequently, the judge stayed all further proceedings pending before the Magistrate until further orders and left the case to be handled by his successor. The decision was taken after Dhanush’s counsel told the court, during the last hearing, that the actor was being trolled on the social media.

more-in The Madras High Court Bench here on Monday adjourned to March 27 further hearing on a petition filed by actor Dhanush to quash a maintenance case filed against him by a couple based at Melur near here. The couple had claimed the actor to be their biological son who dropped out of Class XI and went to Chennai to pursue his interest in acting in 2002. Justice P.N. Prakash adjourned the case after hearing the case in-camera in his chambers for nearly two hours. The judge had decided to hear the case in private to maintain the privacy of both the parties involved in the litigation. The decision was taken after Dhanush’s counsel told the court, during the last hearing, that the actor was being trolled on the social media. The couple R. Kathiresan (65) and his wife K. Meenakshi (53) had filed the maintenance case before a Judicial Magistrate at Melur near here in November last seeking a direction to the actor to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.65,000. They claimed him to be their son K. Kalaichelvan who had changed his name to Dhanush. It was only after the Magistrate issued summons to Dhanush, the present petition was filed in the Bench. Justice G. Chockalingam, who heard the petition at the first instance, directed the actor to appear in the court to verify whether he had visible identification marks on his body as mentioned in the school transfer certificate of the couple’s son. Accordingly, the actor appeared before the High Court Bench on February 28 and he was subjected to physical examination by a government doctor to find out if he had a mole on his left collarbone and a scar on the left forearm. Subsequently, the judge stayed all further proceedings pending before the Magistrate until further orders and left the case to be handled by his successor.

If You Like This Story, Support NYOOOZ

NYOOOZ SUPPORTER

NYOOOZ FRIEND

Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.


Stay updated with all the Latest Madurai headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.

Related Articles

‘Use ITPS to track post’
  • Tuesday | 16th October, 2018
Suspension term reduced
  • Tuesday | 16th October, 2018
Vacation court
  • Tuesday | 16th October, 2018