Two banks asked to refund Rs 40,000, pay compensation
- | Monday | 14th October, 2019
He alleged that the said amount was deducted from his account but was not credited his father’s account. The RMGB in its reply stated that the IMPS transaction was routed to the SBI due to non-updation of IFSC code. It stated that they could not recover the amount because remitter service provider is UCO Bank and the beneficiary bank is the SBI. It stated that both parties were jointly and severally liable to get credited the amount of Rs40,000 to complainant’s father’s account. It also ordered both parties to pay a compensation of Rs3,000 and litigation expenses to the tune of Rs2,000.
If You Like This Story, Support NYOOOZ
Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.
Stay updated with all the Amritsar Latest News headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.