IAS officer moves HC, seeks CBI probe in IMA case

  • | Wednesday | 10th July, 2019

By Express News ServiceBENGALURU: Bengaluru Urban Deputy Commissioner BM Vijay Shankar, who was arrested by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) in connection with the IMA case, has moved the Karnataka High Court seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the case. He has also urged the court to stay all the proceedings initiated against him before the city civil court. “As per Clause 29 and 30 of the ordinance promulgated by the President of India, the CBI can investigate the cases referred by the state government. Therefore, Vijay Shankar cannot be summoned as witness by the SIT and there is vast difference in investigation and enquiry under CrPC. Therefore, the notice is without authority of law, it said.

By Express News Service BENGALURU: Bengaluru Urban Deputy Commissioner BM Vijay Shankar, who was arrested by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) in connection with the IMA case, has moved the Karnataka High Court seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the case. Vijay Shankar has urged the court to quash the notification forming the SIT issued by the government on June 12, 2019, and stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the notice dated July 6, 2019 issued to him. He has also urged the court to stay all the proceedings initiated against him before the city civil court. Urging the court to issue direction to the Central government to entrust the matter to the CBI under Section 29 and 30 of Ordinance 7/19 (Banning of unregulated deposits, schemes, ordinance 2019) promulgated by the President of India, Vijay Shankar contended that the SIT had no jurisdiction to investigate. Making both state and Central governments respondents in his petition, Vijay Shankar has sought directions to the Serious Fraud Investigation Officer (SFIO) to submit a report to the Union government to take action in terms of Section 212 of the Companies Act. “As per Clause 29 and 30 of the ordinance promulgated by the President of India, the CBI can investigate the cases referred by the state government. Therefore, the state exercising power under Section 30 of the Karnataka Protection of Interests of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act is without authority of law, and investigation by SIT is unconstitutional,” he claimed. According to the petition, SIT served notice under Section 160 of the CrPC to Vijay Shankar, who also has been appointed as competent authority under the Karnataka Protection of Interests of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act. Therefore, Vijay Shankar cannot be summoned as witness by the SIT and there is vast difference in investigation and enquiry under CrPC. Being a competent authority, it would not come in the way of the petitioner challenging the notice issued as he can never be a witness in investigation. Therefore, the notice is without authority of law, it said.

If You Like This Story, Support NYOOOZ

NYOOOZ SUPPORTER

NYOOOZ FRIEND

Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.


Stay updated with all the Bangalore Latest News headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.

Related Articles