No less than 80 residents had moved the High Court mounting a challenge to demolition notice received for pulling down the construction.
As such, construction activity was permissible in their area.
As such, objection could not be raised regarding construction activity in Nayagaon and Kansal areas.
Senior advocate and amicus curiae in the case, ML Sarin, on the other hand, had submitted that there was a stay on the construction activity in the Sukhna Lake’s catchment area.
Yet, construction activity was on and required to be stopped.
Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.
Stay updated with all the Chandigarh Latest News headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.