Wife not father has right over deceased man s sperm Cal HC

  • | Friday | 22nd January, 2021

Dismissing the plea on January 19, Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya said that the petitioner does not have any "fundamental right" to permission for collecting the preserved sperm of his son merely by dint of his father-son relationship with the deceased. The sperm preserved at a hospital in Delhi belonged to the deceased and, since he was in a matrimonial relationship till death, the only other person, apart from the deceased, having any right to it is his wife, the court said. "The father-son relationship of the petitioner and the deceased does not entail any such right of the petitioner to the progeny of his son," Justice Bhattacharyya observed. The petitioner contended that his son was a patient of thalassaemia, and had preserved his sperm at the Delhi hospital for use in the future. The hospital, on its part, informed him that the he would need permission from the man's wife, and proof of marriage has to be provided.

Kolkata: The Calcutta High Court has refused to entertain the plea of a man seeking the right to collect his dead sons frozen sperm, maintaining that the only other person, apart from the deceased, having any right to it is his wife. Dismissing the plea on January 19, Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya said that the petitioner does not have any "fundamental right" to permission for collecting the preserved sperm of his son merely by dint of his father-son relationship with the deceased. The petitioners counsel submitted that the widow of his son, in that case, ought to be directed to give her no- objection or, at least, respond to his request. The court, however, rejected the prayer. The sperm preserved at a hospital in Delhi belonged to the deceased and, since he was in a matrimonial relationship till death, the only other person, apart from the deceased, having any right to it is his wife, the court said. "The father-son relationship of the petitioner and the deceased does not entail any such right of the petitioner to the progeny of his son," Justice Bhattacharyya observed. The court further said that as far as the prayer for a direction upon the wife to respond to the petitioners communication is concerned, the matter is beyond the scope of the writ court, as it does not involve any violation of fundamental or statutory right. The petitioner contended that his son was a patient of thalassaemia, and had preserved his sperm at the Delhi hospital for use in the future. According to the counsel, the petitioner, following the demise of his son, approached the hospital seeking access to the frozen sperm on the ground that he is the father of the deceased donor. The hospital, on its part, informed him that the he would need permission from the mans wife, and proof of marriage has to be provided. Following such intimation by the hospital, the petitioner urged the widow of his deceased son to issue a no-objection to him for collecting the sperm, the petitioners lawyer stated, adding that she refused to acknowledge the receipt of the communication.

If You Like This Story, Support NYOOOZ

NYOOOZ SUPPORTER

NYOOOZ FRIEND

Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.


Stay updated with all the Kolkata Latest News headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.

Related Articles