Waive toll for all vehicles driven by differently abled, says PIL

  • | Saturday | 15th September, 2018

He said that not all differently abled individuals can have specially customised vehicles and not all can own such vehicles. The petitioner P. Kumaran is a differently abled person currently working at the Government Law College, Madurai as an Assistant Professor. He further complained that he had faced humiliation after he was checked at various toll booths and was told to pay the toll fee. To accept only customised vehicles for toll fee exemption had a mala fide impact on the interests of the differently abled, besides being a violation of the basic values as enshrined in the Constitution. A public interest litigation petition was filed before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Friday seeking a direction to extend the ‘no toll fee’ benefit granted to customised vehicles driven by differently abled persons to other vehicles that transported such people.

The petitioner complained that he had faced humiliation after he was checked at various toll booths and was asked to pay up. A public interest litigation petition was filed before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Friday seeking a direction to extend the ‘no toll fee’ benefit granted to customised vehicles driven by differently abled persons to other vehicles that transported such people. The petitioner P. Kumaran is a differently abled person currently working at the Government Law College, Madurai as an Assistant Professor. He said that not all differently abled individuals can have specially customised vehicles and not all can own such vehicles. To accept only customised vehicles for toll fee exemption had a mala fide impact on the interests of the differently abled, besides being a violation of the basic values as enshrined in the Constitution. He further complained that he had faced humiliation after he was checked at various toll booths and was told to pay the toll fee. He said his complaints to the authorities fell on deaf ears and sought direction to the authorities to look into the issue and do the needful. Taking up the plea for hearing, a Division Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Sathish Kumar directed notice to the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways returnable in four weeks. The case has been adjourned for further hearing.

If You Like This Story, Support NYOOOZ

NYOOOZ SUPPORTER

NYOOOZ FRIEND

Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.


Stay updated with all the Latest Madurai headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.

Related Articles

‘Use ITPS to track post’
  • Tuesday | 16th October, 2018
Suspension term reduced
  • Tuesday | 16th October, 2018
Vacation court
  • Tuesday | 16th October, 2018