Great power comes with great restraint

  • | Sunday | 28th May, 2017

A country must keep its army strong just as it needs to keep it disciplined and compliant.Which is why the army marries great power with even greater restraint. An institution like the army needs to manage contradictory impulses really well. There is a difference between the codes of conduct of a professional army and others, and this exists not because of any softness, or a desire to be gentlemanly, but because of hard-headed practical reasons. It has access to an enormous amount of force, which it must use in a tightly controlled and directed way. Taking the tied man to 9 villages after having navigated the angry crowd converted a desperate life-saving measure into a legitimate military tactic.

Being a soldier in Kashmir cannot be easy. Putting oneself in the shoes of Maj Gogoi is not a simple thing to do, but it is something we must attempt to do before taking a position on the issue. He was escorting some election officials through a hostile violent stone pelting crowd and had to balance his primary role — that of providing safe passage to the people in his care — with ensuring that he navigated the civilian crowd with the greatest restraint that he could muster.Stones are neither harmless nor are they lethal, at least in most cases — a barrage of stones can cause enormous injury and damage, and eventually there is no telling how violent a frenzied crowd can become. Maj Gogoi had to balance these factors on the spot and make a call. His 'innovative' choice of tying an alleged protestor to the jeep was admittedly not part of the protocol of professional armies, but in the moment it saved lives — not only those of the officials and soldiers but almost certainly those of the protestors.The criticism that this move has attracted needs to take this on board; looked at from the perspective of military personnel, conflict zones such as Kashmir do not lend themselves to simplistic formulations, and the right and wrong trade places more often than we would like. Being charged with the responsibility of keeping order in a state where the population is overwhelmingly opposed to the law and order machinery is a high wire exercise that frays the temperament of anybody, and most soldiers are young kids barely in their twenties.While Maj Gogoi's actions in the moment are possible to understand, the same is not true for all that has followed.Using presence of mind in a tight situation is one thing but celebrating it and legitimising it as a military tactic is quite another. Taking the tied man to 9 villages after having navigated the angry crowd converted a desperate life-saving measure into a legitimate military tactic. There is a difference between the codes of conduct of a professional army and others, and this exists not because of any softness, or a desire to be gentlemanly, but because of hard-headed practical reasons. The right to use human shields could extend much further tomorrow. As an extreme example, what is to prevent the kidnapping of innocents, maybe even women and children and using them as bargaining chips? After all, militants and terrorists often do the same, so why not our soldiers? Indeed, the same principle applies to the police — what if they took steps of this kind in controlling angry crowds?Being a professional soldier is a genuinely difficult task. The willingness to give up one's life on the basis of a command that one has no control over in the name of one's country is an extraordinarily brave thing to do. An institution like the army needs to manage contradictory impulses really well. It has access to an enormous amount of force, which it must use in a tightly controlled and directed way. It calls for an equal willingness to give and take lives. It needs to draw sharp lines between human beings deemed enemies and those understood as friends, and tread the grey areas between the two delicately. A country must keep its army strong just as it needs to keep it disciplined and compliant.Which is why the army marries great power with even greater restraint. It follows rules obsessively and values discipline above all. It cannot give itself the freedom to make up rules as it goes along — overtly it needs to act in an orderly and predictable way — only then can it use the power it possesses in the most useful way possible. This is the difference between a militia and the military. A responsible state cannot let the army dilute these principles because of popular anger and a desire to hit back at those who it disagrees with. The army cannot pay the price for our nationalism with its honour and self-respect. Popular sentiment outside the Valley might back the need for such unconventional actions, but sometimes wisdom lies in acknowledging the popular without acceding to it.santosh365@gmail.com

If You Like This Story, Support NYOOOZ

NYOOOZ SUPPORTER

NYOOOZ FRIEND

Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.


Stay updated with all the Mumbai Latest News headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.

Related Articles