High Court issues notice to UT, CHB

Chandigarh | Tuesday | 19th November, 2019

Summary:

In her case, the original allottee had executed a sale agreement and also issued in her favour a GPA duly registered before a Sub-Registrar. The original allottee also executed a registered will dated June 20, 2000, in favour of the petitioner. An indemnity bond in respect of the house, too, was executed by the original allottee in her favour. Rather, the application form was not given to her and it was intimated that “there was a total ban on the transfer policy in view of the circular/order”. The petitioner submitted that the judgment was delivered on October 11, 2011, and it was clearly mentioned that “SPA/GPA/will transactions” were not intended to apply to “such bona fide genuine transactions”..