Summary:
The CAT said she should be offered equal opportunities for teaching and examiner duty in all future examinations in compliance with the advisory issued by the Medical Council of India. Dr Sood had challenged the decision of the GMCH through counsel DR Sharma for not considering her name for the appointment of an internal examiner despite fulfilling all criteria. The Tribunal said the applicant had a PhD from the PGI which was a medical college. In any case the decision to appoint her as an internal examiner rests with the PU and not with Government Medical College. The respondents are directed to consider and forward her name for appointment as an internal examiner for exams being conducted by the PU..