Summary:
The chief justice said he had planned to take up several developments to the state judiciary but these types of incidents diverted his attention away from development programmes. "Stating that there was no recognised leadership in the Bar, Chief Justice Kaul further observed that it pained him when people would come to his chamber and say one thing and say something else when they go out. "It means nothing but keeping it in abeyance, and there is no need to pass further orders," the bench said. There is no need that a separate order has to be passed again. If advocates think that they don't have to come before the committee and do not want to present their views, it is unfortunate..