Summary:
The entire sequence of events constitutes deficiency in service and the petitioner [the DDA] is squarely responsible for the same.” more-inHolding the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) deficient in services for delay in transfer of ownership of a flat in Rohini, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has upheld the orders of the lower forum directing compensation of ?1 lakh to the flat buyer. Relevant documentsThe land-owning body, however, contended that the additional amount was required as the complainant failed to submit relevant documents. Different documents have been sought from the [complainant] on different dates, some of which are not required and relevant. Upholding orders passed by the district and the State consumer forum, the NCDRC said: “The petitioner [the DDA] is clearly responsible for all delay that has occurred so far..