Supreme court shocked 4,442 criminal cases pending against legislators

Delhi | Monday | 21st September, 2020

Summary:

Last week Supreme Court said it was shocked and feel sorry to learn that there are 4,442 criminal cases pending against legislators—2,556 against sitting lawmakers (MPs and MLAs). 

.

Last week Supreme Court said it was shocked and feel sorry to learn that there are 4,442 criminal cases pending against legislators—2,556 against sitting lawmakers (MPs and MLAs). 

On Thursday, it ordered High Courts to form a special bench to monitor the progress on cases against lawmakers within their respective jurisdictions.

The High Courts are to list all pending criminal cases involving sitting/former lawmakers, including those in which a stay has been granted; as per a report submitted to the apex court, there are 352 cases stayed by the HCs or SC.

In 2017, it had ordered the setting up of special courts to fast-track trial—completion within a year of framing of charges—and 12 such courts had been set up to cater for different states.

The breadth of offences lawmakers have been charged with covers corruption, offences under the child sexual abuse law, tax offences, murder, kidnapping etc.

There are 413 cases where the offences are punishable with life imprisonment; 174 of these involve sitting lawmakers.

This should show how mammoth the task before the judiciary is.

A special bench in each HC to monitor progress is a good step, but how effectively crime in politics is dealt with will need other stakeholders—primarily political parties—to get serious about their roles.

The fact is that crime in politics has gone unchecked despite many interventions by the Supreme Court; in 2018, the court had ordered political parties to publish details of criminal candidates they fielded in polls in mainstream media.

Given how 233 candidates facing criminal chances were elected to the Lok Sabha in 2019—with 159 facing serious criminal charges (87 from the ruling party)—it is clear that the court’s order was either not complied with or had little effect.

So, in February this year, the SC had ordered parties to list ‘criminal’ candidates along with details of crime, status of probe/trial, etc, on their websites, social media accounts and news media within 48 hours of announcing such candidates.