Summary:
A petition filed by Gautam, challenging Verma's election, is pending in high court in which closing arguments are being made by the parties. She had also stated false valuation of her immovable properties and given different figures at different places. "Neena Verma had submitted a defective affidavit, in which details of her bank loan had not been revealed. The judgment was based on the ground that 24 columns in Neena Verma's accepted nomination form were left blank and that she had not given full information about her loans and her immovable property. "However, the form was accepted by the returning officer since they were pressured by Verma's aides," he said.Verma's counsel Champalal Yadav moved an application for a stay on the order..