Vote for BJP in urban local bodies" poll for "triple engine" govt in UP: Adityanath
UP: Man booked for attempting to rape 5-year-old girl
Congress to mark 100 days of Bharat Jodo Yatra with concert in Jaipur
BJYM, Hindu outfits put off planned protest march at AMU
Karachi battles gas crisis; residents face unannounced load shedding, 2-hr gas supply in a day
Elderly man in judicial custody dies during treatment in UP hospital
Himachal Pradesh skittle Haryana for 46, take 200-run lead on Day 1
Pak court grants protective bail to PM Shehbaz"s son Suleman in money laundering case
British Library celebrates India ties with exhibition on Hampi
Nine policemen suspended after suspect dies in police custody in UP
Gangster"s property attached in UP"s Pratapgarh district
Maoists torch construction company vehicles in Jharkhand’s Chatra district
Sino-India border situation "generally stable": China on Yangtse clash
Babar Azam not taking advice from seniors, claims Shahid Afridi
Qlite Global launches their exclusive Grand Experience Centre
"Disillusioned with central leadership": Sikkim BJP president says he has resigned
2001 attack anniversary: Ready to guard new Parliament if directed, say CRPF heroes
Class 2 student dies after scuffle with fellow students in UP
Three killed in accident in UP"s Lakhimpur KheriLakhimpur Kheri (UP), Dec 13 (PTI) Three motorcycle borne youths were killed and "
Abandoned girl child from Assam adopted by Spanish professor
Chennai, Jan 28 (PTI) The Madras High Court on Friday asked authorities to revamp the entire arbitration clause while dismissing an application from the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board to refer to arbitration a dispute over construction of tenements. The case relates to a Namakkal-based engineering firm getting a showcause notice from the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board over damages to the building. The applicants, various officials of Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board including its chairman, had contended the respondent was trying to avoid the process of arbitration by taking a stand as if the claim is of a value above Rs 50,000. Dismissing the application, Justice N Anand Venkatesh said the court has no hesitation to hold that the dispute involved in the present case cannot be referred to arbitration since it has a value of more than Rs 50,000. "Before drawing the curtains, this court wants to impress upon the authorities to revamp the entire arbitration clause. Obviously, there is a total non-application of mind on the part of the authorities which is apparent from the general conditions of contract which forms part of the agreement and it continues to make reference to the provisions of Arbitration Act 1940. This Act has been replaced by Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 which came into effect on August 22, 1996. In spite of the same, for an agreement entered into in the year 2017, the reference is made to the 1940 Act." "The fixation of the value of the claims up to Rs 50,000 to refer the dispute to arbitration has absolutely no meaning in the present day scenario and such a clause has become archaic," the judge said. The judge expressed hope the authorities will wake up to the reality and immediately take steps to revamp the entire arbitration clause in all their agreements. In order to take effective steps, there shall be a direction to mark a copy of this order to the State Chief Secretary, who will instruct all the departments to act upon the directions issued in this order, the court added. PTI CORR SA SA NVG
Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.
