Vote for BJP in urban local bodies" poll for "triple engine" govt in UP: Adityanath
UP: Man booked for attempting to rape 5-year-old girl
Congress to mark 100 days of Bharat Jodo Yatra with concert in Jaipur
BJYM, Hindu outfits put off planned protest march at AMU
Karachi battles gas crisis; residents face unannounced load shedding, 2-hr gas supply in a day
Elderly man in judicial custody dies during treatment in UP hospital
Himachal Pradesh skittle Haryana for 46, take 200-run lead on Day 1
Pak court grants protective bail to PM Shehbaz"s son Suleman in money laundering case
British Library celebrates India ties with exhibition on Hampi
Nine policemen suspended after suspect dies in police custody in UP
Gangster"s property attached in UP"s Pratapgarh district
Maoists torch construction company vehicles in Jharkhand’s Chatra district
Sino-India border situation "generally stable": China on Yangtse clash
Babar Azam not taking advice from seniors, claims Shahid Afridi
Qlite Global launches their exclusive Grand Experience Centre
"Disillusioned with central leadership": Sikkim BJP president says he has resigned
2001 attack anniversary: Ready to guard new Parliament if directed, say CRPF heroes
Class 2 student dies after scuffle with fellow students in UP
Three killed in accident in UP"s Lakhimpur KheriLakhimpur Kheri (UP), Dec 13 (PTI) Three motorcycle borne youths were killed and "
Abandoned girl child from Assam adopted by Spanish professor
CHENNAI: Madras high court on Saturday rejected a PIL seeking a direction to the Centre to appoint a 'full-time' governor for Tamil Nadu, saying there was no provision in the Constitution for one person being governor of more than one state, and that court's interference in such matters was not warranted. "The appointment of a governor is in the realm of the powers of the office of the President of India. "Article 153 of the Constitution provides that there shall be a governor for each state. However, in view of the proviso to Article 153 of the Constitution the interference of the court is not warranted," the bench said. The proviso makes it clear that nothing in that Article shall prevent the appointment of the same person as governor for two or more states," said the first bench of Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M Sundar.The PIL filed by V Anbazhagan said that after the retirement of K Rosaiah as governor of Tamil Nadu on August 31, 2016, governor of Maharashtra Ch Vidyasagar Rao has been given additional charge as Tamil Nadu governor The bench said that neither the PIL nor documents appended thereto whispered about how and in what manner had the executive functions of Tamil Nadu been impaired by the appointment of Ch Vidyasar Rao as governor of the state.
Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.
