Vote for BJP in urban local bodies" poll for "triple engine" govt in UP: Adityanath
UP: Man booked for attempting to rape 5-year-old girl
Congress to mark 100 days of Bharat Jodo Yatra with concert in Jaipur
BJYM, Hindu outfits put off planned protest march at AMU
Karachi battles gas crisis; residents face unannounced load shedding, 2-hr gas supply in a day
Elderly man in judicial custody dies during treatment in UP hospital
Himachal Pradesh skittle Haryana for 46, take 200-run lead on Day 1
Pak court grants protective bail to PM Shehbaz"s son Suleman in money laundering case
British Library celebrates India ties with exhibition on Hampi
Nine policemen suspended after suspect dies in police custody in UP
Gangster"s property attached in UP"s Pratapgarh district
Maoists torch construction company vehicles in Jharkhand’s Chatra district
Sino-India border situation "generally stable": China on Yangtse clash
Babar Azam not taking advice from seniors, claims Shahid Afridi
Qlite Global launches their exclusive Grand Experience Centre
"Disillusioned with central leadership": Sikkim BJP president says he has resigned
2001 attack anniversary: Ready to guard new Parliament if directed, say CRPF heroes
Class 2 student dies after scuffle with fellow students in UP
Three killed in accident in UP"s Lakhimpur KheriLakhimpur Kheri (UP), Dec 13 (PTI) Three motorcycle borne youths were killed and "
Abandoned girl child from Assam adopted by Spanish professor
However, the tiger has been shifted to the south-eastern part which was not even visited by NTCA officials. However, no such compliance report was submitted by the state government, and tiger T-91 was shifted to MHTR in an illegal manner.”It was highlighted that the state authorities have created the MHTR in the form of a zoo with fencing all around the reserve in the name of protecting tigers. “The standard operating procedure of the NTCA does not provide for putting up such a fence and, in fact, deprecates such practices since tigers need open and unrestricted area for their free movement and breeding,” the PIL said.The petitioner also argued that the NTCA had directed the state to shift the tiger to the northern part of MHTR and in-principle approval was provided on that basis. JAIPUR: The Rajasthan High Court on Wednesday issued notices to the Centre and state government over the relocation of tiger T-91 from Ramgarh Vishdhari Wildlife Sanctuary to Mukundra Hills Tiger Reserve (MHTR) in an ‘arbitrary manner’.Acting on a PIL , the division bench of Chief Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice G R Moolchandani sought a reply by May 11.The PIL was filed by one Ajay Shankar Dubey , a green activist.The PIL claims the state government grossly violated standard operating procedure (SOP), prescribed by the National Tiger Conservation Authority ( NTCA ), while capturing tiger T-91 from the Ramgarh Vishdhari Wildlife Sanctuary (Bundi) and relocating it to a newly developed tiger reserve, MHTR.It further says that such relocation of T-9 1 to the new tiger reserve has not been done with the pious motive of providing a new habitat to the tiger, but with the sole intention to increase tourism in the state and provide monetary benefit to a ‘selected few’ at the cost of life of an endangered wild animal.Counsel for the petitioner, Anurag Kalvatiya, informed TOI, “The NTCA from time to time had written various letters to state authorities asking for the compliance report in respect to the actionable points mentioned in its initial letter dated October 9, 2017.
Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.
Stay updated with all the Latest Jaipur headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.
