Alimony can't be denied basis financial status: Bombay High Court

  • | Tuesday | 11th December, 2018

Justice Sonak said, “The independent income must no doubt be taken into consideration. The primary duty of maintenance is that of the ­husband and the same cannot be wished away on the basis of such considerations.”The court also rejected family court’s grounds that the woman was a tutor and was earning sufficient money for her upkeep. Justice MS Sonak while setting aside a family court order of 2016, which had denied any maintenance amount to the wife, said, “The respondent (husband) cannot deny the petitioner’s interim maintenance on the grounds that her parents are rich and affluent or that her parents are in a position to maintain her. In a significant order, the Bombay High Court, while granting an interim maintenance of Rs 75,000 per month to an estranged wife amounting from 2011, held that a husband cannot deny relief on the ground that his wife’s parents are affluent or are in a position to maintain her. However, it is not correct to say that the moment the wife has some income, the claim for interim maintenance must be rejected.”Advocates RV Pai and AR Pai appearing for the woman had argued that the family court erred in observing that since the woman did not pursue the application for interim maintenance, till it was decided in 2016 that she was capable of earning and did not require any interim maintenance.

In a significant order, the Bombay High Court, while granting an interim maintenance of Rs 75,000 per month to an estranged wife amounting from 2011, held that a husband cannot deny relief on the ground that his wife’s parents are affluent or are in a position to maintain her. Justice MS Sonak while setting aside a family court order of 2016, which had denied any maintenance amount to the wife, said, “The respondent (husband) cannot deny the petitioner’s interim maintenance on the grounds that her parents are rich and affluent or that her parents are in a position to maintain her. The primary duty of maintenance is that of the ­husband and the same cannot be wished away on the basis of such considerations.” The court also rejected family court’s grounds that the woman was a tutor and was earning sufficient money for her upkeep. Justice Sonak said, “The independent income must no doubt be taken into consideration. However, it is not correct to say that the moment the wife has some income, the claim for interim maintenance must be rejected.” Advocates RV Pai and AR Pai appearing for the woman had argued that the family court erred in observing that since the woman did not pursue the application for interim maintenance, till it was decided in 2016 that she was capable of earning and did not require any interim maintenance.

If You Like This Story, Support NYOOOZ

NYOOOZ SUPPORTER

NYOOOZ FRIEND

Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.


Stay updated with all the Mumbai Latest News headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.

Related Articles