HC quashes FIR filed after ruckus outside CP house

  • | Monday | 18th February, 2019

Bondre had initially claimed to have been allegedly manhandled by Alexander and Jaiswal causing injuries. Alexander and Jaiswal were booked under Indian penal code (IPC) 385 for extortion and 323 for assault.Though the FIR was filed after much drama, Bondre had opted to file an affidavit withdrawing his grievances against Alexander and Jaiswal. Later, he backtracked claiming he had filed the complaint under the influence of alcohol and had sustained injuries after a fall at a liquor bar.The court underlined the fact that a compromise has already been reached.The applicants were represented by counsel RK Tiwari, while additional public prosecutor JY Ghurde was from the prosecution side. Nagpur: The Nagpur bench of the Bombay high court quashed a first information report ( FIR ) filed at Ganeshpeth police station following a ruckus outside the bungalow of city police chief BK Upadhyay in Civil Lines in the wee hours of January 7.The bench of Justice PN Deshmukh and Justice Rohit Deo invoked it’s inherent power to end litigation following a joint application by the complainant Anand Bondre and two of the accused Hrudayraj Alexander and Manish Jaiswal.

Nagpur: The Nagpur bench of the Bombay high court quashed a first information report ( FIR ) filed at Ganeshpeth police station following a ruckus outside the bungalow of city police chief BK Upadhyay in Civil Lines in the wee hours of January 7.The bench of Justice PN Deshmukh and Justice Rohit Deo invoked it’s inherent power to end litigation following a joint application by the complainant Anand Bondre and two of the accused Hrudayraj Alexander and Manish Jaiswal. Alexander and Jaiswal were booked under Indian penal code (IPC) 385 for extortion and 323 for assault.Though the FIR was filed after much drama, Bondre had opted to file an affidavit withdrawing his grievances against Alexander and Jaiswal. Bondre had initially claimed to have been allegedly manhandled by Alexander and Jaiswal causing injuries. Later, he backtracked claiming he had filed the complaint under the influence of alcohol and had sustained injuries after a fall at a liquor bar.The court underlined the fact that a compromise has already been reached.The applicants were represented by counsel RK Tiwari, while additional public prosecutor JY Ghurde was from the prosecution side.

If You Like This Story, Support NYOOOZ

NYOOOZ SUPPORTER

NYOOOZ FRIEND

Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.


Stay updated with all the Latest Nagpur headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.

Related Articles