HC impleads BCI in case against advocates

  • | Tuesday | 2nd October, 2018

It ordered filing of a status report by the Bar Council of India as well as the State Bar Council and posted the case for further hearing on October 22. The court had earlier impleaded the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry in the case. The court also took note of the fact that two other advocates, S. Saravanakumar and V. Subramani, were also involved in the case. The State Bar Council had already initiated action against them. The Bar Council of India, taking up the appeal, granted an interim stay on the action taken against him and the case has been pending for over two years.

more-in MADURAI The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Monday suo motu impleaded the Bar Council of India after it was brought to the notice of the court that an advocate whose name was struck off the advocates’ roll was still indulging in illegal activities such as conducting kangaroo courts. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh took cognisance of the fact that S.R. Balasubramanian, the advocate whose name was struck off the rolls in 2016, was indulging in illegal activities after he went on an appeal before the Bar Council of India against the removal of his name. The Bar Council of India, taking up the appeal, granted an interim stay on the action taken against him and the case has been pending for over two years. Balasubramanian has three cases, booked under various sections of the IPC, pending against him. Balasubramanian reportedly continued to indulge in illegal activities such as conducting kangaroo courts, arm-twisting innocent persons and extorting money by interfering in lawful possession of properties, the court said. The court also took note of a case in which ? 5 lakh was obtained from a property owner through extortion by Balasubramanian, who allegedly went to the extent of putting up an advocate’s office on the property. Following the intervention of the High Court Bench and the Dindigul Superintendent of Police, the property was restored to the rightful owner. The court also took note of the fact that two other advocates, S. Saravanakumar and V. Subramani, were also involved in the case. The State Bar Council had already initiated action against them. A fourth person, Vetriselvam, a law student, was also reportedly involved in the case. The court directed that the law student not be enrolled until further orders as “it is better to prevent such persons from getting into the profession at the threshold itself.” The court directed that the pending appeal be taken up by the Bar Council of India which should complete the proceedings within two months and restrain the advocates from practising before any court in the State. The court had earlier impleaded the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry in the case. It ordered filing of a status report by the Bar Council of India as well as the State Bar Council and posted the case for further hearing on October 22.

If You Like This Story, Support NYOOOZ

NYOOOZ SUPPORTER

NYOOOZ FRIEND

Your support to NYOOOZ will help us to continue create and publish news for and from smaller cities, which also need equal voice as much as citizens living in bigger cities have through mainstream media organizations.


Stay updated with all the Latest Madurai headlines here. For more exclusive & live news updates from all around India, stay connected with NYOOOZ.

Related Articles

HC impleads BCI in case against advocates
  • Tuesday | 2nd October, 2018
‘Use ITPS to track post’
  • Tuesday | 16th October, 2018
Suspension term reduced
  • Tuesday | 16th October, 2018
Vacation court
  • Tuesday | 16th October, 2018